logo
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Captain Insano  
#1 Posted : 11 August 2010 23:12:25(UTC)
Captain Insano
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,529
Location: Give me more sunliiiiiight!

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 23 post(s)
Or so cry the French and also some Australians who want a woman to remove her veil whilst giving evidence in a trial against an Islamic cleric. French president Nicolas Sarkozy himself has said "The burqa is not a religious sign, it is a sign of the subjugation, of the submission of women. I want to say solemnly that it will not be welcome on our territory.”

What's your opinion on burqa's/niqabs etc? Do you view the burqa as an expression of inequality and a symbol of female opression within the Islamic world (which the burqa predates Islam), where the women as part of cultural tradition are forced to shroud their face so as to perserve the 'honor' of the woman's partner from others preying eyes? Does it isolate the wearer from the rest of society? After all, facial expressions and been able to interpret them are an important aspect when interacting. Then there is the shrill cry of security risks and all that.

Or, should we just butt out from forcing others to change their customs and practices of another religion to satisfy our own insecurities? Is such an attempt to ban it bigoted and just plain wrong?

Feel free to discuss...I'll add my peice later on.



UserPostedImage
_____________
The Black Gates- Progressive technical metal
The Infidels!- Retro doom funk grindcore
The Graveyard Sluts- dirty, slutty rawwwwk
Psycopathologist- old school death grind

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, it's just that your's is stupid.
Offline Gildermershina  
#2 Posted : 11 August 2010 23:53:20(UTC)
Gildermershina
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 13/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,094
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Probably not here

Was thanked: 113 time(s) in 76 post(s)
I think it's a dumb and entirely antiquated custom that should not exist. It seems practically medieval to subjugate women in that manner. But it is nevertheless a religious tradition, therefore I would allow people to practice their religion. Provided it's not an infringement upon those who do not practice the religion then I say let them be. But that said, I also think people should keep pointing out how stupid it is until the doctrine changes. It happens, it just takes time and pressure. Many Christians still believe it is wrong to work on a Sunday (even though the Sabbath is a non-specific day that could indeed be any day of the week) - silly, but it doesn't affect me so I say leave them to their insanity.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImage
Offline erich hess  
#3 Posted : 12 August 2010 13:27:47(UTC)
erich hess
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 09/04/2010(UTC)
Posts: 42,629
Man
United States
Location: representing the 954

Thanks: 21696 times
Was thanked: 17928 time(s) in 10420 post(s)
if anyone believes this law is based on equal rights for women,i have some prime swampland in arizona for sale.


granted,i fully believe society will be better off when religion is dead and buried.but this law is vindictive in nature and is wrong.
UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
"I'm not saying its even a good thing to own a chimpanzee. But that's freedom, folks." Alex Jones.
Offline asdf  
#4 Posted : 12 August 2010 13:49:22(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.

As for the veil, I dont think they should wear it in a court trial. We cant wear hats that cover our head, why should they be allowed to cover theirs?
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
Offline Gildermershina  
#5 Posted : 12 August 2010 21:20:46(UTC)
Gildermershina
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 13/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,094
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Probably not here

Was thanked: 113 time(s) in 76 post(s)
asdf wrote:
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.


If you're talking about absence of religion then that is a truly ridiculous leap to make. I am not religious and I have high moral standards. Morals come as much from philosophy as from religion, and the difference is that one is an obligation through fear, and the other one is a personal obligation to oneself. As for hope for the future, religions all come with their own apocalyptic endtimes that are only hopeful for the few who believe they follow the precise religious doctrine that was intended from the beginning as opposed to those guys over there who definitely got it wrong.

Religion is not the foundation of society at all, nor is it the foundation of civilisation, only of empires and oppression.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImage
Offline asdf  
#6 Posted : 12 August 2010 22:03:43(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
Gildermershina wrote:
asdf wrote:
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.


If you're talking about absence of religion then that is a truly ridiculous leap to make. I am not religious and I have high moral standards. Morals come as much from philosophy as from religion, and the difference is that one is an obligation through fear, and the other one is a personal obligation to oneself. As for hope for the future, religions all come with their own apocalyptic endtimes that are only hopeful for the few who believe they follow the precise religious doctrine that was intended from the beginning as opposed to those guys over there who definitely got it wrong.

Religion is not the foundation of society at all, nor is it the foundation of civilisation, only of empires and oppression.


Cause moral standards are posting things like "Sailor Moon Rape Porn for Weirdos " and cursing a ton?

Not my point though, religion may not be the foundation of society, but it certainly was at a time. America was based on Christianity, now did we warp it to ourselves with things like slavery and such? Yes, and that's why we look down upon our pasts and look for a better future. To say that religion is a sign of empires and oppression is nuts as well. Have people taken it out of the foundations and blown it into that? Definitely but religion itself isn't the cause of some lunatics who happened to have their hands in the right spot at the right time.

I am not saying religion is the one and only important thing out there, but a world without it would be madness. The hope for the future comment was the fact that atheists think that death is to enter eternal nothingness. I'm not saying you should be a believer just because you want to make sure that if its right that you got your foot in the door, that wouldn't work anyway. But for some it provides a hope that we will live on with our loved ones. Its certainly better than "Well hes gone, whos next?"
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
Offline genocidal king  
#7 Posted : 12 August 2010 22:13:17(UTC)
genocidal king
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 21/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 54,407
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Leeds, England

Thanks: 3468 times
Was thanked: 11549 time(s) in 5886 post(s)
Gildermershina wrote:
asdf wrote:
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.


If you're talking about absence of religion then that is a truly ridiculous leap to make. I am not religious and I have high moral standards. Morals come as much from philosophy as from religion, and the difference is that one is an obligation through fear, and the other one is a personal obligation to oneself. As for hope for the future, religions all come with their own apocalyptic endtimes that are only hopeful for the few who believe they follow the precise religious doctrine that was intended from the beginning as opposed to those guys over there who definitely got it wrong.

Religion is not the foundation of society at all, nor is it the foundation of civilisation, only of empires and oppression
.



Abso-bloody-exactly
UserPostedImage
Offline troy211619  
#8 Posted : 12 August 2010 23:14:38(UTC)
troy211619
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,432
Man

Thanks: 23 times
Was thanked: 56 time(s) in 38 post(s)
Dang, thought this was about burgers!
zicon wrote:
So what is Role Play all about, Imagination?


Aj wrote:
I don't dislike pop, I dislike bad music.

Liam


UserPostedImage
Offline Gildermershina  
#9 Posted : 13 August 2010 06:53:57(UTC)
Gildermershina
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 13/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,094
Man
United Kingdom
Location: Probably not here

Was thanked: 113 time(s) in 76 post(s)
asdf wrote:
Gildermershina wrote:
asdf wrote:
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.


If you're talking about absence of religion then that is a truly ridiculous leap to make. I am not religious and I have high moral standards. Morals come as much from philosophy as from religion, and the difference is that one is an obligation through fear, and the other one is a personal obligation to oneself. As for hope for the future, religions all come with their own apocalyptic endtimes that are only hopeful for the few who believe they follow the precise religious doctrine that was intended from the beginning as opposed to those guys over there who definitely got it wrong.

Religion is not the foundation of society at all, nor is it the foundation of civilisation, only of empires and oppression.


Cause moral standards are posting things like "Sailor Moon Rape Porn for Weirdos " and cursing a ton?

Not my point though, religion may not be the foundation of society, but it certainly was at a time. America was based on Christianity, now did we warp it to ourselves with things like slavery and such? Yes, and that's why we look down upon our pasts and look for a better future. To say that religion is a sign of empires and oppression is nuts as well. Have people taken it out of the foundations and blown it into that? Definitely but religion itself isn't the cause of some lunatics who happened to have their hands in the right spot at the right time.

I am not saying religion is the one and only important thing out there, but a world without it would be madness. The hope for the future comment was the fact that atheists think that death is to enter eternal nothingness. I'm not saying you should be a believer just because you want to make sure that if its right that you got your foot in the door, that wouldn't work anyway. But for some it provides a hope that we will live on with our loved ones. Its certainly better than "Well hes gone, whos next?"


Well, personal hope for the future is fine, you can have that.

My personal moral standards are founded on the idea that words are not actions.

But really, I think you should read about the history of the Christian church, seeing as how it was created specifically to control the Roman populace by standardising their beliefs. The entire history of Europe is conflict between religious empires and "heathens". Some of the earliest European settlers in the US were religious extremists fleeing oppression. As for the notion that the USA was founded on Christianity, I think you'll find it was founded on religious freedom, as an attempt to break away from the old European traditions of empiricism. The "Christian values" that America was supposedly founded on are values found in most religions and amongst secular societies. It's not like without religion people wouldn't know not to kill each other, or not to steal. Those ideals predate any of today's religions. The Sumerians had written laws as early as 2050BC.

Anyway, on the fundamental point we do agree, there should be a certain amount of religious freedom provided it does not impinge upon wider society.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImage
Offline forkboy  
#10 Posted : 13 August 2010 21:30:01(UTC)
forkboy
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,255
Location: Glasgow

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 107 time(s) in 82 post(s)
Gildermershina wrote:

Anyway, on the fundamental point we do agree, there should be a certain amount of religious freedom provided it does not impinge upon wider society.

I can dig that. My problem with religion is mainly when it's forcing ITS moral values (or itself) upon other people.

But let me say right up that people who think that all morality comes from religion are horribly misguided and clearly lack even a basic understanding of moral philosophy/ethics.

Oh and you can be perfectly moral and still swear like a sailor, in what fucking world are swear worlds immoral? It is language. Yelling fuck when you drop a plate on your toe is now immoral? Oh dear oh dear.
Offline asdf  
#11 Posted : 13 August 2010 21:41:26(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
I myself recently have learned some of the mistakes of "religion" and I find being a spiritual person to be much more rewarding. I dont quite know how to explain it but its explained well in this interview.


(If Dan reads this (Stephanie)...yes I really am obsessed with Cash.)
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
Offline forkboy  
#12 Posted : 14 August 2010 03:06:56(UTC)
forkboy
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,255
Location: Glasgow

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 107 time(s) in 82 post(s)
See, I do not believe in moral absolutism. Moral absolutists believe that "Right" & "Wrong" do not change. But anybody who looks around at the world today and compares it to the 1930s (or for more extreme results go even further back in time. Like say...4000 years back to the age of Moses and the roots of Judeo-Christian mores and rules) can see that things have changed. Things are relative, they depend on the era they happen in, in circumstances and so forth. Like if you ask me if killing someone is immoral I'll tell you yes, of course in the first instance. But if someone charged at you with a knife and the only way to not be killed was to force that knife away from your neck and into his, can you call and act of genuine self-defence with no desire to kill immoral? Or to pick another example which is to me really hilarious in a dark kind of way, lets take a fundamentalist Christian from Alabama, who we'll call Billy Bob Joe Deliverance. Now Billy Bob Joe Deliverance goes to church every week, he's a good God fearing man, and he believes that only God has the right to end a mans life, and that abortion is murder. So Billy Bob Joe Deliverance goes to an abortion clinic and sticks a bomb into the car of one of the doctors, who gets blown up. Which I hardly need to point out is an act of murder in itself. And yes it's an extreme example, but it happens. Now to me that is an abhorent and inexcusable act by a man who has likely been driven insane by blind faith in fairies and so forth, but to Billy Bob Joe Deliverance he is morally jusitified.

In essence I believe that morality is a personal thing. It is influenced by society, by the people that we know and the surrounding culture, but ultimately we all have differing opinion on what is right and wrong. And because of that there cannot possibly BE an absolute right and wrong. That's how I see it. And even our own personal morality changes over time.
Offline Rincewind  
#13 Posted : 14 August 2010 06:41:16(UTC)
Rincewind
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 10/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,995
Man
Location: i honestly don't know.

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 124 time(s) in 87 post(s)
isn't this an argument about an item of clothing and not morality (which is totally different.... i also find it amusing how people attach morality to religion, as if someone who does not follow a religion is banned from having morals).

anyway, i think everyone has the right to wear whatever they want as long as it covers the bits which need covering in polite society.... as long as they are not forced into wearing it then it has nothing to do with me.... if they are being forced into wearing it then we need to tackle the reasons behind it and not the item itself.
I hate it when people see me at the supermarket and they are like:
Hey, what are you doing here?
and im just like:
Oh you know, hunting elephants
Offline forkboy  
#14 Posted : 14 August 2010 10:15:49(UTC)
forkboy
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 05/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,255
Location: Glasgow

Thanks: 34 times
Was thanked: 107 time(s) in 82 post(s)
Rincewind wrote:
isn't this an argument about an item of clothing and not morality (which is totally different.... i also find it amusing how people attach morality to religion, as if someone who does not follow a religion is banned from having morals).

anyway, i think everyone has the right to wear whatever they want as long as it covers the bits which need covering in polite society.... as long as they are not forced into wearing it then it has nothing to do with me.... if they are being forced into wearing it then we need to tackle the reasons behind it and not the item itself.

Part of the problem with the item of clothing is that sexism is utterly ingrained into the culture and religious laws of Islam.
User is suspended until 16/05/4760 03:38:29(UTC) stephaniewazhere  
#15 Posted : 14 August 2010 10:38:23(UTC)
stephaniewazhere
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 18,252
United States

Thanks: 6248 times
Was thanked: 7557 time(s) in 3439 post(s)
asdf wrote:
I myself recently have learned some of the mistakes of "religion" and I find being a spiritual person to be much more rewarding. I dont quite know how to explain it but its explained well in this interview.

(If Dan reads this (Stephanie)...yes I really am obsessed with Cash.)



No shock at all. I could have a problem about paying my light bill, and you will be able to find an advice from Johnny Cash on youtube lol
Offline asdf  
#16 Posted : 14 August 2010 11:06:00(UTC)
asdf
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 11/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,340
Man
Location: Narsik

Thanks: 295 times
Was thanked: 539 time(s) in 290 post(s)
stephaniewazhere wrote:
asdf wrote:
I myself recently have learned some of the mistakes of "religion" and I find being a spiritual person to be much more rewarding. I dont quite know how to explain it but its explained well in this interview.

(If Dan reads this (Stephanie)...yes I really am obsessed with Cash.)



No shock at all. I could have a problem about paying my light bill, and you will be able to find an advice from Johnny Cash on youtube lol


Lol, pretty much.
Proud member since September 6th, 2007!

Proud to be a mod since May 5th, 2011!

Currently writing the longest Solo-Written RP in Rockstar Game History
Offline Aj  
#17 Posted : 14 August 2010 22:11:46(UTC)
Aj
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,543
Man
Location: Jamaica

Thanks: 27 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 28 post(s)
asdf wrote:
Gildermershina wrote:
asdf wrote:
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.


If you're talking about absence of religion then that is a truly ridiculous leap to make. I am not religious and I have high moral standards. Morals come as much from philosophy as from religion, and the difference is that one is an obligation through fear, and the other one is a personal obligation to oneself. As for hope for the future, religions all come with their own apocalyptic endtimes that are only hopeful for the few who believe they follow the precise religious doctrine that was intended from the beginning as opposed to those guys over there who definitely got it wrong.

Religion is not the foundation of society at all, nor is it the foundation of civilisation, only of empires and oppression.


Cause moral standards are posting things like "Sailor Moon Rape Porn for Weirdos " and cursing a ton?

Not my point though, religion may not be the foundation of society, but it certainly was at a time. America was based on Christianity, now did we warp it to ourselves with things like slavery and such? Yes, and that's why we look down upon our pasts and look for a better future. To say that religion is a sign of empires and oppression is nuts as well. Have people taken it out of the foundations and blown it into that? Definitely but religion itself isn't the cause of some lunatics who happened to have their hands in the right spot at the right time.

I am not saying religion is the one and only important thing out there, but a world without it would be madness. The hope for the future comment was the fact that atheists think that death is to enter eternal nothingness. I'm not saying you should be a believer just because you want to make sure that if its right that you got your foot in the door, that wouldn't work anyway. But for some it provides a hope that we will live on with our loved ones. Its certainly better than "Well hes gone, whos next?"


The bit in bold is just plain silly. If there wasn't religion, the world would be a massively better place in my opinion. Religion is just another reason to segregate people into different classes. You got colour, nation and religion. There's violence about colour, there's violence about what nations your from but I can pretty much guarantee there have been millions more deaths because of religion. Religion is a means of controlling people, it's a way of giving people a reason to not fuck up and go on a mad raping spree - because if they do they'll burn eternally. Now that sound's a pretty good idea, but only if the person in control of the religion is a fucking saint and is just out for everyone's best interests which for thousands of years they haven't been. Religion from my point of view seems an absolutely ridiculous idea just full of indoctrination, persecution and segregation. Fuck that, I am a good person because I like the rewards of being a good person, not because I'm scared of going to hell. And so no, a world without religion would not be madness, it'd be a far saner place than it is at the moment.

And about the burqa, as much as I dislike religion I'm not going to be hypocritical and become the reason that I dislike religion by being controlling and telling people what they can and can't do. However, I do think that burqa's are a step too far and they represent one of the negative parts of religion. It doesn't at all show any of the good aspects of religion like hope, morals and justice, it's just pretty much oppression in my opinion, if a woman want's to wear a burqa out in public, go for it, but in a court of law, school, hospital etc they should follow the rules like everyone else. Though I don't see why you'd want to wear one in Australia you'd boil but yeah, if it's the woman's choice she can wear a hotdog on her head for all I care, just in 99% of the cases it's not the woman's desire to, it's more the fact they're scared of what will happen if they don't...
User is suspended until 16/05/4760 03:38:29(UTC) stephaniewazhere  
#18 Posted : 15 August 2010 00:16:00(UTC)
stephaniewazhere
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 21/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 18,252
United States

Thanks: 6248 times
Was thanked: 7557 time(s) in 3439 post(s)
A world without religion would be no world.

Offline Laurelles1  
#19 Posted : 15 August 2010 01:22:15(UTC)
Laurelles1
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Moderators, Registered
Joined: 09/11/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8,329
Man
Location: Floating about on an iceberg somewhere

Thanks: 436 times
Was thanked: 407 time(s) in 288 post(s)
It would, just a substantially different one.
Awards (stroking myself and thinking I'm superior):
@Chaos awards:
Best Band - Mind
Best Album - Shattered Fairytale by Mind
Technical Ecstasy - Jason Smith (x3)
Best Solo Male - Jason Smith
Birdies:
Best Producer - Jason Smith

UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage
Offline Captain Insano  
#20 Posted : 15 August 2010 02:33:33(UTC)
Captain Insano
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,529
Location: Give me more sunliiiiiight!

Thanks: 4 times
Was thanked: 31 time(s) in 23 post(s)
Aj wrote:
asdf wrote:
Gildermershina wrote:
asdf wrote:
Society would be better off when we all believe in nothing, no moral standards, no hope for the future and when the thing that most countries was founded on is non-existent? I disagree.


If you're talking about absence of religion then that is a truly ridiculous leap to make. I am not religious and I have high moral standards. Morals come as much from philosophy as from religion, and the difference is that one is an obligation through fear, and the other one is a personal obligation to oneself. As for hope for the future, religions all come with their own apocalyptic endtimes that are only hopeful for the few who believe they follow the precise religious doctrine that was intended from the beginning as opposed to those guys over there who definitely got it wrong.

Religion is not the foundation of society at all, nor is it the foundation of civilisation, only of empires and oppression.


Cause moral standards are posting things like "Sailor Moon Rape Porn for Weirdos " and cursing a ton?

Not my point though, religion may not be the foundation of society, but it certainly was at a time. America was based on Christianity, now did we warp it to ourselves with things like slavery and such? Yes, and that's why we look down upon our pasts and look for a better future. To say that religion is a sign of empires and oppression is nuts as well. Have people taken it out of the foundations and blown it into that? Definitely but religion itself isn't the cause of some lunatics who happened to have their hands in the right spot at the right time.

I am not saying religion is the one and only important thing out there, but a world without it would be madness. The hope for the future comment was the fact that atheists think that death is to enter eternal nothingness. I'm not saying you should be a believer just because you want to make sure that if its right that you got your foot in the door, that wouldn't work anyway. But for some it provides a hope that we will live on with our loved ones. Its certainly better than "Well hes gone, whos next?"


*snip*

And about the burqa, as much as I dislike religion I'm not going to be hypocritical and become the reason that I dislike religion by being controlling and telling people what they can and can't do. However, I do think that burqa's are a step too far and they represent one of the negative parts of religion. It doesn't at all show any of the good aspects of religion like hope, morals and justice, it's just pretty much oppression in my opinion, if a woman want's to wear a burqa out in public, go for it, but in a court of law, school, hospital etc they should follow the rules like everyone else. Though I don't see why you'd want to wear one in Australia you'd boil but yeah, if it's the woman's choice she can wear a hotdog on her head for all I care, just in 99% of the cases it's not the woman's desire to, it's more the fact they're scared of what will happen if they don't...


Why am I not surprised this thread would lead towards religion and morals? :D
Well I'd imagine it to be a bitch to wear in boiling shitholes like Pakistan. Not all that common in Australia, rather rare to see someone walking the streets in a burqa. You may see plenty of head scarfs but hardly the burqa. Either way I think it's an opressive cultural/religous tradition, one that reflects a woman's worth (or lack thereof) within Islamic society. It's like they are not worthy of others and must be controlled.

How do you interact with someone with a full face viel? You can't see their facial expressions to gauge their mood etc. A woman clad in the burqa can be with her husband and he dressed simply in a singlet, shorts and thongs. Madness really. I dont think the solution is to ban it, more like instigating cultural change away from it (whether that's through eventual assimilation into, as an example Australian society over time between generations) but it would be difficult given it seems so ingrained.

As to whether the world would be better without religion? I couldn't care less...each to their own. They keep their god bothering crap to themselves over that corner of the room and I'll keep my atheistic leanings over here to myself.
UserPostedImage
_____________
The Black Gates- Progressive technical metal
The Infidels!- Retro doom funk grindcore
The Graveyard Sluts- dirty, slutty rawwwwk
Psycopathologist- old school death grind

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, it's just that your's is stupid.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.435 seconds.