sharinganerror wrote:I meant like only 1 partner, if you only had 1 which you were both eachothers first and only, chance of AIDS=0% 1 and only gay partner=after awhile=AIDS
Yeah, that's not how you get AIDS or else the first recorded cases would be from 3000 years ago, the Greeks were well known man lovers for example. Which is funny as the first time something akin to AIDS creeps into medical records was in the 1950s. AIDS is caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), a virus which attacks the immune system. Of humans. Indescriminately. Doctors believe that HIV is a mutated form of Simian Immounodeficiency Virus (SIV) which has mutated to humans twice in slightly different forms, HIV-1 (from chimps) & HIV-2 (from Sooty Mangabey, which is a monkey in west Africa). It would have first mutated into a virus that can be transmitted to humans some point from the late 19th century and the early 20th when a hunter killed a chimp with the mutated strain of SIV, got cut and then while butchering the animal his blood mixes with it's, or something else along those lines.
Absolutely none of that has anything to do with sexuality. NOTHING. If both partners do not have HIV or AIDs going into the relationship, and they stay together as a monogomaus couple for their whole lives, the only chance they have of getting HIV is through contaminated blood in a blood transfusion, but that tends to be filtered out nowadays, most countries will test you before you donate blood so that if you have any illness you are not illegible, and you certainly aren't OK to give blood if you have HIV or AIDS.
sharinganerror wrote:You have to remember that denying the fact that he is GOD is like saying Abraham Lincoln didn't unlawfully fight the confederacy like a fascist.
You are right. But not in the way you think, both of your statements are very silly things to say. I mean it was also very unlawful for the confederacy to break away from the union. There is no hard evidence that there is a god or a multitude of gods, and so it comes down to a matter of personal choice whether you believe which ever holy book is thrown in front of you, or not. Of course, I'd compare belief in a god to be on a par with belief in the Roswell Conspiracy or the Loch Ness Monster or Bigfoot or many other ventures into fantasy where "I've seen him" but there is still a real lack of good evidence either way. When something as big as god is a matter of faith, I'm a skeptic, I've been brought up to admire the scientific method, and this means that I need empirical, observable data.
Oh, and your definition of fascism is really lacking. Fascism is a political ideology that combines authoritarianism, nationalism, imperialism and economic corporatism, not really how I'd describe Lincoln's policy, never mind that the fascist ideology wasn't really codified until the 1910s. But that's just me nit-picking.
