Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/09/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,749 Location: Somewhere in the universe Thanks: 11 times Was thanked: 39 time(s) in 28 post(s)
|
Gildermershina wrote:Mt. Epic wrote:Gildermershina wrote:Mt. Epic wrote:Paradox wrote:Mt. Epic wrote:For it, cuz we can.
Animals aren't doing anything and are depleting our own resources for building their conservation sites. They might as well get a job, those lazy bums. besides, most people who say they don't want to do animal testing, you all eat meat. Not all, but most animal rights activists are major hypocrits, and most vegetarians are potheads. Who says it's our resources? Well if it ain't ours then the person or people or beings or whatever didn't do a good job guarding it Okay, I know you're only young, but that's extremely stupid. Animals are not eating up our resources. The only animals that are eating our resources really are cattle livestock, and that's a human concern not an animal one. I was sarcastic about that. I'm a proud supporter of the Darwinist ideals, and so I believe, if you want something accomplished, get it accomplished, but you're gonna have to do it with your own force and strength. If us humans want to test animals, then we should do it, but we are going to have to do it with our own force and strength. If animals don't want to be able to get tested, then they should fight back, but they are going to do it with their own force and strength, but unfortunately for them, they ain't that wise nor do they have the strenght to escape. If people don't want animals to be tested, they will have to make sure it doesn't happen, but they will have to do it with their own force and strength. But, for the people who don't want animals to be used for experiments are dumb, because they then would have to use a human for experimentations, which would put a human in risk, but once again, you could classify the human like an animal in this situation. Basically, these experimentations are all dangerous and nobody wants to do them, and those who want animals are merrily saying that they don't want to do it. So, if you want to have sex with a lady, you should totally just do it, with your own force and strength, and if she's not strong enough to stop you, then that's fine?TheCDs wrote:Gildermershina wrote:Imagine an alien species flies to the Earth. Physically they're stronger. Mentally they're stronger. Emotionally, they're capable of experiencing feelings beyond human comprehension. To them, pain isn't like we would understand as a response to an injury, it actually physically degrades the parts of their brains responsible for their memories and personalities. So that means they should totally test their drugs on humans right? After all, we're not capable of their level of pain therefore should it not be okay for them to inflict it on us instead of on themselves. That's how I see it. We are able to exert our control over them so if we want to test on them we should. If super aliens show up I hope they are the council races from Mass Effect that way we will already be protected from testing, for the most part at least. Seems to me aliens are more likely to be Collectors than Asari... This is the "we can therefore we should" argument, either because you believe human life more valuable, or because you believe it is simply the logical course of action, or because you simply don't believe in ethics. Any which way I can't really sympathise with this viewpoint. well, technically yes. If she wants to stop, she should, but she'll have to stop it by herself. But, teamwork is something useful. But it is her who starts to tell the man to stop, and if the man wants to stop, he stops. But if he doesn't, then it's rape, which our society frowns upon, but still, you could do it. Not recommending it or anything, but, basically, it's your own will power. |
Fuck yo punk ass! Da BBC Kingz gon' getchu! |